erratio: (Default)
[personal profile] erratio
 Here's an interesting pattern:

Generation 1: Highly religious, highly insular. People who aren't part of the faith are inferior/damned/the enemy. Possibly all three simultaneously.
Generation 2: Moderately religious, highly insular. People who aren't part of the faith aren't 'one of us' but they have some good points, I guess. Just don't go marrying one of them.
Generation 3: Moderately to non-religious, moderately insular. Other people can believe whatever they want, but people like us should still identify with each other and our religion more than with outsiders.
Generation 4: Mostly non-religious, moderately to non-insular. Belief is a personal thing and largely taboo to talk about. People shouldn't choose who they associate with on the basis of their religion.
Generation 5: Woah, you still care about religion? What a weirdo.

What I'm wondering here is:

* Is that pattern actually correct? Or at least largely correct. My own family has Gen 2 in my grandmother, Gen 2.5 in my mother, and Gen 4 in me (Gen 5 is my sister)
* Did the rise of tolerance cause the weakening religious ties or is it another factor controlling both, like increased personal prosperity or greater multiculturalism?
* Regardless of the historical cause of the decline of religion, can teaching tolerance weaken religious ties? It seems like it might, since the 'everyone's belief is personal' meme implies that religion shouldn't be taken any more seriously than any other subjective opinion about the world. And unlike political opinions we don't have to make regular semi-important choices based on our religious affiliation.

Date: 2010-12-02 01:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ocassis.livejournal.com
I think there's more going on here than just a tolerance/religion relationship. In the public eye, religion is becoming allied with a variety of forms of fanaticism, from Muslim extremists to Creationism, and this makes people uncomfortable talking about it and wearing it as part of their identity. Religion is by nature a social phenomenon, so the more that the social aspects of religion get diffused--including by increasing tolerance, which causes people to associate less frequently with only members of their religion--the more religious belief declines in individuals. Also, there's a sort of positive feedback loop from the whole process, which is what causes the decline over time. As a counter-reaction, religious groups that are still strong become either more fanatical or more tolerant, both of which hurt their long-term position. Religion as a cultural staple, as opposed to cult-like religion, requires wide social acceptance, and that seems to be losing ground, although it's still far too early to say what will happen in the future.

Profile

erratio: (Default)
erratio

September 2019

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223242526 2728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 31st, 2025 08:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios